Lens control-rings relative placement
I've noticed that many of the newer zoom lenses from several major manufacturers (Canon, Sony, Sigma, and especially Nikon), have the MF-ring closer to the lens mount, and the zoom ring farther from the lens mount. Not too long ago all lenses had zoom close/MF far.
What is your preference, is MF-close more user friendly or convenient?
Re: Lens control-rings relative placement
Ergonomically, one puts the control most used the farthest away - because that's where the thumb and index finger are.
The flip between the zoom and focus ring reflect the fundamental shift occuring in photographers' shooting habits. The reliance/preference on auto focus and zooms.
I remember a time when zooms were, by far, a minority in a lens line-up and autofocus wasn't even developed. Now, many of the newer lenses have barely a focus ring.
The three zooms I currently own (Canon 16-35mm, 24-105mm, and 70-200mm) all have it "correctly" - the focus ring out front. I tried the 28-135mm for about a week but couldn't stand the flipped orientation.
Re: Lens control-rings relative placement
Quote:
Originally Posted by A.M.D.A.
What is your preference, is MF-close more user friendly or convenient?
I virtually never use MF, the zoom ring is the only one I use. As long as that is convenient, I'm happy
Re: Lens control-rings relative placement
I very much prefer them on the outer edge. What possible reason could manufacturers put them in front for? Even with the greater reliance on auto-focus, whats the point? I can't imagine a zoom working better on the front...
Re: Lens control-rings relative placement
Thanks for the responses. When Loupey replied I must have had accidentally deleted to email notification before reading... :blush2: