I've been curious while looking at camera reviews and such, what people mean when they say "entry level SLR" (such as a Canon Rebel XS). Realistically, you should be able to take the same quality pictures, right? People are always saying that the real issue is the quality of lens you're shooting with. From what I can tell, the nicer cameras have some cool features and stuff, but not the kind of things that change picture quality when doing everything manually. An example would be more AF points, those don't really matter if you're focusing manually. Higher megapixel, that doesn't really matter as long as I'm not blowing it up significantly. Higher ISO and Shutter speed, I can get around those. I know some cameras have better color reception and stuff, but I've seen pictures that professionals have taken with "entry level SLR's" that are amazing. What do you guys think?
-Oblivion