Digital SLR Cameras Forum

Digital SLRs Forum Discuss digital SLRs, lenses, RAW conversion, or anything else related to digital SLRs. You may also want to see the Nikon, Canon, and Sony camera forums.
Digital Camera Pro Reviews >>
Read and Write Digital SLR Reviews >>
Digital SLR Buyer's Guide >>
Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Baldwin Park, CA
    Posts
    2

    Digital SLR Lens Vs. Film SLR Lens (mm)

    This is something I found interesting. I used to own a Canon EOS IX Lite (very rare and strange camera) yeah, I know, I had it for about 2 years and had quite a few SLR lens with it. What I noticed is that with this particular camera, I had to use a *multiplier* to find out the real Lens is. For example, a 22-55mm lens (the included kit lens) is actually a 36-88mm, or what they put in print, a 35-90 mm.

    I never knew what that meant, because I didn't have a 35mm film body to mount the lens on and compare the differences, in short, I want to know if the same lens looked through by a dRebel and then through a 35mm SLR would yield a different focal length.

    Now, with a new 300D/dRebel, I find this camera is the same-it has *35mm equivalence* and its kit lens, which has an 18-55mm lens (which is not a super wide angle BTW) is actually a 28-90mm. What does the multiplier really *mean*?

    I know that the 18-55 can't be mounted on 35mm film cameras, but if it could, would you in theory have a wide angle 18mm-55mm lens? Do I need to offset a 1.6x multiplier on every lens I slap onto the debel body?

    Thanks, I'm hoping some people out there with a 35mm and dRebel body can help.

  2. #2
    Sitting in a Leaky Dingy Michael Fanelli's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Perryville, MD
    Posts
    926

    Mulipliers

    A multiplier isn't real!

    A lens has a certain focal length. It is independent of the camera it is used on. A 50mm lens is a 50mm lens.

    However, the field of view changes. A 50mm lens on a 6x7 camera is a wide angle, on a 35mm it's "normal", on an APS digital camera, its a mild telephoto. People who use multiple formats, such as 35mm and 6x7 understand this and never really talk about "multiplier factors."

    The "35mm equilvalent" is just marketing. The vast majority of photographers are used to using 35mm. These "equivalent" values are just a mental aid that says "if you use this 50mm lens on an APS sensor it sorta kinda looks like the 80mm lens you used to use".

    Instead of worrying about these things, start thinking about what the lens does on the format you have chosen. When I grab a 45mm lens for a 6x7 camera I don't think "Hmmm, what would this be if I were using 35mm?" The same goes for the Rebel: worry what it looks like on the Rebel, not some other irrelevent format. You should not worry about 35mm if you aren't using 35mm!


    Quote Originally Posted by zenderfall
    What I noticed is that with this particular camera, I had to use a *multiplier* to find out the real Lens is. For example, a 22-55mm lens (the included kit lens) is actually a 36-88mm, or what they put in print, a 35-90 mm.

    I never knew what that meant, because I didn't have a 35mm film body to mount the lens on and compare the differences, in short, I want to know if the same lens looked through by a dRebel and then through a 35mm SLR would yield a different focal length.

    Now, with a new 300D/dRebel, I find this camera is the same-it has *35mm equivalence* and its kit lens, which has an 18-55mm lens (which is not a super wide angle BTW) is actually a 28-90mm. What does the multiplier really *mean*?

    I know that the 18-55 can't be mounted on 35mm film cameras, but if it could, would you in theory have a wide angle 18mm-55mm lens? Do I need to offset a 1.6x multiplier on every lens I slap onto the debel body?

    Thanks, I'm hoping some people out there with a 35mm and dRebel body can help.
    "Every great decision creates ripples--like a huge boulder dropped in a lake. The ripples merge and rebound off the banks in unforseeable ways.

  3. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    ABQ, NM
    Posts
    294

    Yep

    Quote Originally Posted by Michael Fanelli
    Instead of worrying about these things, start thinking about what the lens does on the format you have chosen. When I grab a 45mm lens for a 6x7 camera I don't think "Hmmm, what would this be if I were using 35mm?" The same goes for the Rebel: worry what it looks like on the Rebel, not some other irrelevent format. You should not worry about 35mm if you aren't using 35mm!
    This sounds just like what I told someone recently when he was concerned about a 100mm 1:1 macro lens on a drebel. He coulnd't grasp magnification is size of the image on the sensor divided by the size of the object. Somehow he thought the lens magnification somehow increased.

    I finally told him not to worry and just look through viewfinder and take the picture.

    Mike

  4. #4
    has-been... another view's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Rockford, IL
    Posts
    7,649
    Quote Originally Posted by darkman
    I finally told him not to worry and just look through viewfinder and take the picture.

    Mike
    Good advice. It's really more of a crop factor than a magnification factor, but after using your camera you'll just know what lens to grab. Like Michael says, 50mm is different on every different format.

    It's not a bad thing to talk about though - some DSLR's are (in comparison to 35mm) full frame, 1.3, 1.5, 1.6 and probably others. This way you know what you're looking at, after all you will use the 35mm lenses on the DSLR body. Since mine's a 1.5, I knew my 20mm lens would only have the angle of view of a 30mm so at some point I'll have to get something wider. That disadvantage works out to an advantage with my 80-200 f2.8 - it's now a (in terms of angle of coverage) 300 f2.8.

  5. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    ABQ, NM
    Posts
    294
    Quote Originally Posted by another view
    disadvantage works out to an advantage with my 80-200 f2.8 - it's now a (in terms of angle of coverage) 300 f2.8.
    For MY photography I found the 1.5x it to be a disadvantage. However, I'm really liking the sigma 12-24 even better than my canon 17-35L. The extra "reach" in dof is great for landscapes.

    Now that I have the sigma, I really can't complain on the long end. It does open up some new oportunities! Plus now I have a 12-24, 24-70/2.8L, 70-200/2.8ex and a 1.4x tc (that's collecting more dust than ever). I still find I rarely use beyond ~150mm.

    Mike

  6. #6
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Baldwin Park, CA
    Posts
    2
    Thanks for all the replies. I guess I shouldn't worry about the lens factors and just keep on shooting. Photography isn't all about focal length, or maximum aperture. Its about pictures after all.



    Quote Originally Posted by darkman
    For MY photography I found the 1.5x it to be a disadvantage. However, I'm really liking the sigma 12-24 even better than my canon 17-35L. The extra "reach" in dof is great for landscapes.

    Now that I have the sigma, I really can't complain on the long end. It does open up some new oportunities! Plus now I have a 12-24, 24-70/2.8L, 70-200/2.8ex and a 1.4x tc (that's collecting more dust than ever). I still find I rarely use beyond ~150mm.

    Mike
    Attached Images Attached Images  

  7. #7
    has-been... another view's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Rockford, IL
    Posts
    7,649
    Quote Originally Posted by darkman
    I'm really liking the sigma 12-24 even better than my canon 17-35L. Mike
    Heard that's a great lens, it's next on the list for me!

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Comparison digital to film...
    By UiUiUiUi in forum Digital Cameras - General
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 03-31-2004, 06:31 PM
  2. New Kodak DCS Pro SLR for Canon Users
    By Photo-John in forum Camera News & Rumors
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 03-19-2004, 06:28 PM
  3. Which camera for B&W photography F100, N80, D70 ?
    By Hahabas in forum Digital Cameras - General
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 03-17-2004, 12:02 PM
  4. Press Release: Canon PowerShot A75 and PowerShot A310
    By Photo-John in forum Camera News & Rumors
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 02-09-2004, 03:14 PM
  5. Press Release: 8 Megapixel Canon PowerShot Pro1
    By Photo-John in forum Camera News & Rumors
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 02-09-2004, 02:55 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •