Digital SLR Cameras Forum

Digital SLRs Forum Discuss digital SLRs, lenses, RAW conversion, or anything else related to digital SLRs. You may also want to see the Nikon, Canon, and Sony camera forums.
Digital Camera Pro Reviews >>
Read and Write Digital SLR Reviews >>
Digital SLR Buyer's Guide >>
Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    Mandinator! Mando327's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Tallahasee, FL
    Posts
    65

    Low Light Primes

    Hey y'all. I have a Canon 20D with a 24-70mm f/2.8L, and 70-200mm f/2.8. I also have the 580EX (flash). I have been researching for a lens ideal for wedding photography, where light might be low and flash not desired. I was thinking of using this lens when the bride is getting ready in the house or hotel etc before the ceremony. Initially i was thinking the 35mm 1.4, but that seems a bit too wide. I usually like to include a good portion of the face. Then i started thinking that the 50mm 1.4 would be perfect, but considering the reviews (they are nonetheless good, when compared to the price, but lens has it's flaws), and then started considering the 85mm 1.2, but that seems to be quite expensive, slow AF, and very much tight (zoomed) for a room, although correct me if i'm wrong. Anyone with experience in this? Also consider my 1.6x crop factor, for you film and 1Ds guys.
    Thanks,
    Mando

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    nowhere
    Posts
    1,908

    Re: Low Light Primes

    Mando,

    I would think from the two lenses you have already, you should try those in the situation your are talking about trial wise first and see the results you get first without spending anymore money.

    I have read that the range of prime from 85 - 135mm is the ideal to stay in anyway. I beleive the 100 and 135 prime lenses are excellent lenses as well.

  3. #3
    has-been... another view's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Rockford, IL
    Posts
    7,649

    Re: Low Light Primes

    I would start with the 50 f1.4. On 35mm, I'd usually use an 85 for that and with the conversion factor a 50 would give you about the same angle of view. I use "Brand N" and use both the 50 and 85 (85 more with film; 50 more with digital). The 50 is also by far the least expensive. Canon's 24 f1.4 would be a great one too.

  4. #4
    Sitting in a Leaky Dingy Michael Fanelli's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Perryville, MD
    Posts
    926

    Re: Low Light Primes

    Just keep in mind that apertures such as 1.4, 1.8 etc. have so little DOF that they are only useful in very specific situations.
    "Every great decision creates ripples--like a huge boulder dropped in a lake. The ripples merge and rebound off the banks in unforseeable ways.

  5. #5
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Chicago,Il
    Posts
    15

    Re: Low Light Primes

    I am a wedding photographer. I use the Nikon D70 and F100 with the following AF Nikkors; 24-85, 20mm F2.8, 35mm F2, 50mm F1.4. I just added the 105mm F2.8 Micro Nikkor to this setup.
    I have it all covered with that package for weddings. Check out my website for some wedding pics;
    http://www.williamkazak.com
    wkazak@ameritech.net

  6. #6
    Erstwhile Vagabond armed with camera Lionheart's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    California
    Posts
    1,110

    Re: 85 f1.2L and slow AF

    My own personal observation with the 85 f1.2L is that I don't think it's slow at all. I ran into a fellow photog on the street during the last weekend who just happened to have the 85 f1.2L and 20D. We traded cameras for a few minutes comparing notes between the 20D and the 1DmkII. I've read that the 85 f1.2L is slow, but darned if I could tell the difference in speed between that and my 28-70 that I had on my 1D. On the 20D it seemed to snap focus instantly, maybe even faster than my 1D (well to be fair to my camera, it was set to only one AF point, while my 1D had all 45 AF on.) It sure was bright in the viewfinder with that lens. I'd recommend it for weddings based on that alone, but the 85 f1.8 consumer version which I have is a very fine lens, and very quick to focus (probably my fastest focusing lens in my possesion-and I've got more than a few "L" lenses in that collection). I personally wouldn't bother with the 50 f1.4, it's a nice lens, but it spends more time in my camera bag than any lenses except for the 1.4x and 2x teleconverters. Of my primes, the 85 f1.8 and the 135 f2L get the most use on my cameras during weddings and studio shoots. Just my two bits.
    Seek the Son and the shadows fall behind you.

    slowly inching to 2000

    Mac's Rule, Windblows drools
    Friends don't let Friends use WindBlows XPee
    <img src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v11/schrackman/clover.jpg">Lionheart O'Canon Feel Free to Help

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 11-06-2004, 02:25 PM
  2. Replies: 9
    Last Post: 11-05-2004, 11:47 AM
  3. One light, no backdrop
    By Sebastian in forum Studio & Lighting
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 09-22-2004, 11:05 AM
  4. Looking for low light digital camera in 5 mp range
    By rthiebes in forum Digital Cameras - General
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 08-03-2004, 06:52 AM
  5. shooting in low light with Canon Zr60
    By msim2020 in forum Digital Video
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-30-2004, 08:20 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •