Digital SLR Cameras Forum

Digital SLRs Forum Discuss digital SLRs, lenses, RAW conversion, or anything else related to digital SLRs. You may also want to see the Nikon, Canon, and Sony camera forums.
Digital Camera Pro Reviews >>
Read and Write Digital SLR Reviews >>
Digital SLR Buyer's Guide >>
Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1
    Senior Member OldClicker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Mundelein, IL USA
    Posts
    4,075

    The IS question...

    It seems that, with my inability to hold the camera steady, I would see a significant benefit from 'image stabilazation'. Question is - should I concentrate on trying to pick up a Sony with IS in the camera so I only pay for it once instead of every time I by a lens? - TF
    -----------------
    I am no better than you. I critique to teach myself to see.
    -----------------
    Feel free to edit my photos or do anything else that will help me learn.
    -----------------
    Sony/Minolta - way more gear than talent.

  2. #2
    MB1
    MB1 is offline
    The Skeptical Photographer MB1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Washington, DC and Clermont, FL
    Posts
    3,144

    Re: The IS question...

    Well the problem with gettin IS in the body is that every time a body is upgraded you start to get the urge to buy a new body. OTOH all your lenses are going to have IS and if you have problems at ALL focal lengths IS in the body works with wide angles too (most IS lenses are medium to long focal lengths).

    The advantage of IS in the lens is that lenses are current for a long time and when the bodies with hot new features are introduced your IS lenses will work with them.

    In other words it is six of one and a half-dozen of the other.
    No, I DON'T need that.

  3. #3
    Member Don Kondra's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
    Posts
    353

    Re: The IS question...

    Greetings,

    Image Stabilization is a useful feature. I prefer to have it in camera.

    While you're looking at Sony you may want to consider Olympus. Very generally speaking the camera's and lenses are also smaller and easier to hand hold.

    In the end though cost might be the deciding factor.

    While the Standard lenses are relatively inexpensive, the High Grade lenses are in the $500 range and the Super High Grade are ~ $1000.

    The cheapest alternative is a tripod

    Cheers, Don

  4. #4
    Color me obvious dumpy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    CNY
    Posts
    257

    Re: The IS question...

    Quote Originally Posted by MB1
    Well the problem with gettin IS in the body is that every time a body is upgraded you start to get the urge to buy a new body. OTOH all your lenses are going to have IS and if you have problems at ALL focal lengths IS in the body works with wide angles too (most IS lenses are medium to long focal lengths).

    The advantage of IS in the lens is that lenses are current for a long time and when the bodies with hot new features are introduced your IS lenses will work with them.

    In other words it is six of one and a half-dozen of the other.
    While I mostly agree with these statements, I have to say that I wouldn't worry about upgrading the body and not having IS. IS is becoming an important part of DSLR systems, Nikon and Canon put it into some of their lenses, Olympus and Sony put it into some of their bodies. Not sure what Pentax has done in this area.

    Oly and Sony are not going to stop putting IS in their bodies, a new, but similar body to your old one (say from an Olympus 520 to a 530 if thats what they are going to call it) will most likely still have IS, possibly with a design that improves on the old one.

    I think in the long run, IS in the body is probably cheaper, but there are so many other factors at play in regards to cost.

    The real question is, which one performs better??
    Please ask before editing my photos, I'll say yes



    I like to take the pictures...

  5. #5
    Senior Shooter Greg McCary's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Rome Ga.
    Posts
    10,550

    Re: The IS question...

    I agree with Dumpy. It seems in body is really not to expensive. If you compare the cost of the Olympus 420 (without IS), to the cost of the 520(with IS). It is really a bargian for how well it works. Cheaper than a tripod and easier to carry. And even the older OM lenses can be used with IS.
    I am like Barney Fife, I have a gun but Andy makes me keep the bullet in my pocket..

    Sony a99/a7R

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •