Comparing the DMCFZ100K to the DMCFZ40K the only difference I see
is the flash hot shoe. Same MPs and zoom.
So, is it worth paying $90 more? I rarely shoot so close that I need flash, mostly zoom out, nature, landscape, some macro.
The DMCFZ47PK is 2mp less, no flash hot shoe, but is $20 less than FZ100.
Why get less MP's? Why not even go down to 10mp if they felt IQ is worse on a 14mp? Why not increase sensor size instead?