Quote Originally Posted by Michael Fanelli
Only Olympus is making 4/3 cameras so the discussion is minimal. The format is smaller than current APS sensors which limits its image quality. The 4/3 lenses are stuck with 4/3, other companies using 35mm lenses allows all sensor sizes up through full frame.

Sensor prices are dropping which means that affordable large sensors are in the future. Manufacturers other than Olympus are upgradable. I personally won't invest in a small format that is locked in place when so many other expandable choices exist.
Sticking my neckout, (and being indeed concerned about the chip size of 4/3rds), I browsed this forum and found several comments by you with the consistent line that 'Larger sensors always win so Olympus will always be behind the cuve of image quality.'.

Can you substantiate this, and especially to the extent of what the human eye can detect. You may be theoretically right but if we can't see the 'weakness' in terms of image quality then does it matter. Furthermore, I find no posts about poor E1 image quality?